Olympus TG-3 vs Sigma DP2
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
86 Imaging
44 Features
28 Overall
37
Olympus TG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2009
- Successor is Sigma DP2s
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Olympus TG-3 versus Sigma DP2, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sigma. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and DP2 (5MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and DP2 (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-3 was revealed 4 years after the DP2 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summation of how the TG-3 scores vs the DP2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Sigma DP2. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sigma DP2
| TG-3 | DP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2014 |  | September 2009 | More modern by 56 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 over the Olympus TG-3
| DP2 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sigma DP2
| TG-3 | DP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-3 comes with external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 has dimensions of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-3 versus Sigma DP2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-3 and the DP2.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and DP2 is 90 and 86 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes only by checking out specs. The image here might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-3 and DP2.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-3 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus TG-3 will show extra detail because of its extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more modern TG-3 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sigma DP2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sigma DP2 |
| Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-03-31 | 2009-09-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 41mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 15 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 280g (0.62 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $649 |