Olympus TG-3 vs Sigma SD9
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Olympus TG-3 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-3 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Olympus TG-3 versus Sigma SD9, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-3 was brought out 11 years later than the SD9 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-3 matches up vs the SD9 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-3 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sigma SD9
| TG-3 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2014 | November 2002 | Fresher by 139 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 130k | Sharper screen (+330k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Olympus TG-3
| SD9 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sigma SD9
| TG-3 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-3 comes with external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-3 versus Sigma SD9 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-3 vs the SD9.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and SD9 is 90 and 54 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading specs. The photograph below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and SD9.
As you can plainly see, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-3 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus TG-3 will deliver more detail having its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher TG-3 provides an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-3 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sigma SD9 |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2014-03-31 | 2002-11-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 3MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 130k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 950g (2.09 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $3,001 |