Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A200
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- New Model is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Released July 2008
- Successor is Sony A230
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A200 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A200, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-3 was brought out 5 years after the A200 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the TG-3 scores versus the A200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sony A200
TG-3 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2014 | July 2008 | Newer by 70 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus TG-3
A200 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sony A200
TG-3 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-3 has got exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-3 against the A200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-3 and A200 is 90 and 66 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The image here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and A200.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-3 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus TG-3 will show greater detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more recent TG-3 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2014-03-31 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 572g (1.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $350 | $100 |