Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A300
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- Updated by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Introduced January 2008
- Later Model is Sony A330
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A300 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus TG-3 versus Sony A300, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and A300 (10MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) possess different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-3 was revealed 6 years after the A300 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the TG-3 grades vs the A300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sony A300
| TG-3 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | January 2008 | Newer by 76 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus TG-3
| A300 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sony A300
| TG-3 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-3 has outside measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony A300 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-3 versus Sony A300 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-3 against the A300.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and A300 is 90 and 64 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions merely by looking through technical specs. The image here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and A300.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-3 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Olympus TG-3 will result in more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer TG-3 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A300 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2014-03-31 | 2008-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 632 grams (1.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Compact Flash |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $350 | $0 |