Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A330
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
67 Imaging
50 Features
50 Overall
50
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 529g - 128 x 97 x 71mm
- Announced May 2009
- Superseded the Sony A300
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A330 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus TG-3 and Sony A330, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and A330 (10MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and A330 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-3 was manufactured 4 years after the A330 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony A330 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the TG-3 matches up versus the A330 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A330 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A330. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Sony A330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sony A330
TG-3 | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | May 2009 | Newer by 60 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A330 over the Olympus TG-3
A330 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sony A330
TG-3 | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A330 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-3 has outside measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony A330 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") with a weight of 529 grams (1.17 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-3 and Sony A330 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-3 compared to the A330.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and A330 is 90 and 67 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A330 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions only by going over specs. The pic below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-3 and A330.
All in all, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-3 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Olympus TG-3 will offer you more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more recent TG-3 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A330 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2014-03-31 | 2009-05-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 529 gr (1.17 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 535 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 230 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $350 | $545 |