Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX100 V
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c62ad/c62adda3df33c555b7142020fb576a7ad037cf6b" alt="Olympus Tough TG-3 front Olympus Tough TG-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2eaf8/2eaf83d822e69481fe2112141f904cee5032a36b" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V front"
89 Imaging
53 Features
80 Overall
63
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX100 V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Released October 2016
- Superseded the Sony RX100 IV
- New Model is Sony RX100 VI
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX100 V Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus TG-3 versus Sony RX100 V, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the RX100 V (20MP) is very comparable but the TG-3 (1/2.3") and RX100 V (1") use different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The TG-3 was manufactured 3 years before the RX100 V and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 V being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the TG-3 matches up versus the RX100 V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX100 V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Sony RX100 V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sony RX100 V
TG-3 | RX100 V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 V over the Olympus TG-3
RX100 V | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2016 | ![]() | March 2014 | More recent by 30 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+769k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sony RX100 V
TG-3 | RX100 V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX100 V Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-3 has physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony RX100 V has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") having a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-3 versus Sony RX100 V in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-3 against the RX100 V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b0e0/7b0e0cfc58e3fc825b8e85139b6639ea85e3f557" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX100 V size comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX100 V size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-3 and RX100 V is 90 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f88d6/f88d68f01a0f486c7ee84f6c0e6a1da228a389b7" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX100 V top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX100 V top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX100 V Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The graphic below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and RX100 V.
All in all, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The TG-3 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Sony RX100 V will show more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older TG-3 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23bb2/23bb2c94248e2177276dd40239681d0728042d4f" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX100 V sensor size comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX100 V sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX100 V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67a16/67a16b20378eae75294b67d5dd1e3d1c99d51e7d" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX100 V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX100 V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX100 V Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-03-31 | 2016-10-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 24.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 299g (0.66 lbs) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 586 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 220 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $350 | $998 |