Clicky

Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX1R II

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42
Olympus Tough TG-3 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II front
Portability
78
Imaging
76
Features
65
Overall
71

Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs

Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Revealed March 2014
  • Successor is Olympus TG-4
Sony RX1R II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 50 - 25600 (Expand to 102400)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
  • Revealed October 2015
  • Superseded the Sony RX1R
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX1R II Overview

In this article, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX1R II, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and RX1R II (Full frame) come with totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The TG-3 was announced 18 months before the RX1R II which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the TG-3 matches up versus the RX1R II for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sony RX1R II

 TG-3 RX1R II 

Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Olympus TG-3

 RX1R II TG-3 
RevealedOctober 2015March 2014More recent by 18 months
Manually focus More exact focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1229k460kCrisper screen (+769k dot)

Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sony RX1R II

 TG-3 RX1R II 
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-3 has physical measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony RX1R II has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).

Compare the Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX1R II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-3 vs the RX1R II.

Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX1R II size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and RX1R II is 90 and 78 respectively.

Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX1R II top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and RX1R II.

Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-3 using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony RX1R II will produce greater detail with its extra 26MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The older TG-3 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX1R II sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Portrait photography features
Sony RX1R II Portrait photography features
37
good MP (16MP)
has face detection focus
manual focus not available
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
85
has manual focus
above average flash sync (1/4,000 seconds)
resolution is amazing (42MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
includes face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus TG-3
Street photography with Sony RX1R II
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than competition (247g)
73
screen tilts up and down
large sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
great ISO range (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
heavier than competitors in class (507g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Sports photography details
Sony RX1R II Sports photography details
47
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
environment proofing
great battery power (330 shots)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
63
resolution is amazing (42MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
includes tracking focus
comes with phase detect autofocus
can't change focal length (35mm)
max fps low (5.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
terrible battery power (220 CIPA)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-3 as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX1R II as a Travel photography camera
74
great battery power (330 CIPA)
environment proofing
good MP (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competition (247 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
59
resolution is amazing (42 megapixels)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
does not have Time Lapse recording
terrible battery power (220 per charge)
heavier than competitors in class (507 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Landscape photography information
Sony RX1R II Landscape photography information
56
fairly wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
environment proofing
great battery power (330 per charge)
manual focus not available
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
68
has manual focus
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3")
resolution is amazing (42 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
does not have low pass filter
great ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (35mm)
does not have image stabilization
terrible battery power (220 shots)
does not have Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Vlogging details
Sony RX1R II Vlogging details
34
fairly wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
no external mic socket
heavier than competition (247g)
34
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
includes face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have mic support
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
heavier than competitors in class (507 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus TG-3 vs Sony RX1R II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-3 and Sony RX1R II
 Olympus Tough TG-3Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus Tough TG-3 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
Type Waterproof Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2014-03-31 2015-10-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII BIONZ X
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 42 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 7952 x 5304
Max native ISO 6400 25600
Max boosted ISO - 102400
Lowest native ISO 100 50
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 35mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/2.0
Macro focus distance 1cm 14cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 460k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology TFT-LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 5.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 247 gr (0.54 lbs) 507 gr (1.12 lbs)
Dimensions 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 97
DXO Color Depth score not tested 25.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.9
DXO Low light score not tested 3204
Other
Battery life 330 shots 220 shots
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-92B NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2,5, 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $350 $3,300