Olympus TG-3 vs Sony S930
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony S930 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 320 x 240 video
- 38-108mm (F2.9-5.4) lens
- 167g - 90 x 61 x 26mm
- Launched January 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-3 vs Sony S930 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus TG-3 and Sony S930, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and S930 (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-3 was unveiled 5 years after the S930 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the TG-3 scores versus the S930 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-3 vs Sony S930 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Sony S930 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sony S930
| TG-3 | S930 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2014 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 64 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 112k | Clearer display (+348k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S930 over the Olympus TG-3
| S930 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sony S930
| TG-3 | S930 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony S930 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-3 enjoys physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony S930 has specifications of 90mm x 61mm x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-3 and Sony S930 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-3 versus the S930.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and S930 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony S930 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching specs. The picture underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and S930.
All in all, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-3 to render extra detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The fresher TG-3 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony S930 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony S930 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-03-31 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 38-108mm (2.8x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.9-5.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.4 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 112k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Forced Flash, Slow Syncro, No Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 90 x 61 x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / PRo-HG Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $350 | $219 |