Olympus TG-3 vs Sony TX200V
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched January 2012
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-3 versus Sony TX200V, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-3 was announced 2 years later than the TX200V and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the TG-3 scores versus the TX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sony TX200V
TG-3 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2014 | January 2012 | Fresher by 27 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus TG-3
TX200V | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Clearer display (+770k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sony TX200V
TG-3 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-3 features outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-3 versus Sony TX200V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-3 against the TX200V.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and TX200V is 90 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-3 and TX200V.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony TX200V to resolve more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent TG-3 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2014-03-31 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT-LCD | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 129g (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 220 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $350 | $500 |