Olympus TG-3 vs Sony TX7
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
95 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony TX7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Launched January 2010
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony TX7 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Olympus TG-3 versus Sony TX7, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and TX7 (10MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and TX7 (1/2.4") possess different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-3 was introduced 4 years after the TX7 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX7 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a short summary of how the TG-3 grades versus the TX7 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony TX7 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX7. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Sony TX7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sony TX7
TG-3 | TX7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2014 | January 2010 | More modern by 52 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX7 over the Olympus TG-3
TX7 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Crisper display (+461k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sony TX7
TG-3 | TX7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony TX7 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-3 comes with outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony TX7 has measurements of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-3 versus Sony TX7 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-3 versus the TX7.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and TX7 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony TX7 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The image here will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-3 and TX7.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-3 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-3 will give extra detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more recent TG-3 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony TX7 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony TX7 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX7 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2014-03-31 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 149 gr (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, optional SD, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $350 | $300 |