Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W650
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W650 Key Specs
Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
Sony W650
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 124g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W650 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W650, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the W650 (16MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-3 was brought out 2 years after the W650 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the TG-3 matches up against the W650 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W650 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Sony W650 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sony W650
| TG-3 | W650 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 28 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W650 over the Olympus TG-3
| W650 | TG-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sony W650
| TG-3 | W650 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W650 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-3 has got physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony W650 has measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W650 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-3 vs the W650.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and W650 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W650 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The picture underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-3 and W650.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels and you can expect similar quality of images however you really should take the launch date of the products into consideration. The newer TG-3 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W650 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-3 Portrait photography factors
Sony W650 Portrait photography factors
decent MP (16MP)
has face detection focus
no manual focus
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
megapixel count good (16MP)
offers face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-3 as a Street photography camera
Sony W650 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than competitors in class (247g)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (124g)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Olympus TG-3 Sports photography highlights
Sony W650 Sports photography highlights
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
weather sealing
better than average battery power (330 shots)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
offers tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-3 Travel photography info
Sony W650 Travel photography info
better than average battery power (330 CIPA)
weather sealing
decent MP (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competitors in class (247g)
screen is not selfie friendly
lighter than competition in class (124 grams)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-3 Landscape photography highlights
Sony W650 Landscape photography highlights
pretty wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
better than average battery power (330 CIPA)
no manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
decently wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-3 Vlogging highlights
Sony W650 Vlogging highlights
pretty wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing external mic socket
heavier than competitors in class (247g)
decently wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
lighter than competition in class (124g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W650 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-03-31 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.6-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | 220 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $350 | $140 |