Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A68
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
64 Imaging
66 Features
70 Overall
67
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A68 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- New Model is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 610g - 143 x 104 x 81mm
- Released November 2015
- Superseded the Sony A65
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A68 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus TG-3 versus Sony A68, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and A68 (24MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and A68 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-3 was brought out 19 months earlier than the A68 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony A68 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the TG-3 scores versus the A68 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A68 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Sony SLT-A68. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Sony A68 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sony A68
TG-3 | A68 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony A68 over the Olympus TG-3
A68 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2015 | March 2014 | More modern by 19 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sony A68
TG-3 | A68 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A68 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-3 has got physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony A68 has dimensions of 143mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") having a weight of 610 grams (1.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-3 versus Sony A68 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-3 against the A68.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and A68 is 90 and 64 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A68 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through a spec sheet. The picture here will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-3 and A68.
As you can see, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-3 because of its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh harder and the Sony A68 will provide greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged TG-3 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A68 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A68 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony SLT-A68 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony SLT-A68 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2014-03-31 | 2015-11-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 79 |
Cross type focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Flash off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Rear sync, Wireless, High Speed sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p, 24p), 1440 x 1080, 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 610 gr (1.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 143 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 701 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 510 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (Yes (2 or 12 sec)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $350 | $581 |