Olympus TG-3 vs Sony ZV-1
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
88 Imaging
54 Features
86 Overall
66
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony ZV-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Updated by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 294g - 105 x 60 x 44mm
- Released May 2020
- Renewed by Sony ZV-1 II
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-3 vs Sony ZV-1 Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Olympus TG-3 versus Sony ZV-1, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the ZV-1 (20MP) is pretty similar but the TG-3 (1/2.3") and ZV-1 (1") posses different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-3 was launched 7 years prior to the ZV-1 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony ZV-1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the TG-3 matches up versus the ZV-1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-3 vs Sony ZV-1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Sony ZV-1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Sony ZV-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sony ZV-1
| TG-3 | ZV-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony ZV-1 over the Olympus TG-3
| ZV-1 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2020 | March 2014 | More recent by 74 months | |
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sony ZV-1
| TG-3 | ZV-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony ZV-1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-3 enjoys outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony ZV-1 has proportions of 105mm x 60mm x 44mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.7") and a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-3 versus Sony ZV-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-3 vs the ZV-1.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and ZV-1 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony ZV-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements only by reading a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and ZV-1.
Clearly, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-3 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh trickier and the Sony ZV-1 will deliver more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older TG-3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony ZV-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony ZV-1 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony ZV-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony ZV-1 |
| Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-03-31 | 2020-05-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 315 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 24.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 24 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 17 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 294g (0.65 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 105 x 60 x 44mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | 260 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $350 | $750 |