Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS200
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Released February 2018
- Also referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS100
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS200, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the ZS200 (20MP) is pretty close but the TG-4 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") offer totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-4 was launched 3 years before the ZS200 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the TG-4 scores versus the ZS200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Panasonic ZS200
TG-4 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus TG-4
ZS200 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | April 2015 | Newer by 34 months | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 460k | Crisper screen (+780k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic ZS200
TG-4 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-4 comes with exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") and a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-4 vs the ZS200.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and ZS200 is 90 and 86 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and ZS200.
Clearly, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-4 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Panasonic ZS200 will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged TG-4 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Alternative name | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2015-04-13 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 340 grams (0.75 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | 370 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $379 | $800 |