Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FH22
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched April 2015
- Older Model is Olympus TG-3
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
Panasonic FH22
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS33
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic FH22, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the FH22 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-4 was released 5 years after the FH22 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the TG-4 grades against the FH22 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Panasonic FH22
| TG-4 | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2015 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 65 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus TG-4
| FH22 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic FH22
| TG-4 | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-4 provides outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Panasonic FH22 has proportions of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic FH22 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-4 against the FH22.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-4 and FH22 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking specifications. The pic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and FH22.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-4 to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The newer TG-4 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography information
Panasonic FH22 Portrait photography information
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
decent megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Street photography info
Panasonic FH22 Street photography info
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
environment proofing
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
heavier than competitors in class (247 grams)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes focus by touch
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Olympus TG-4 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FH22 as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
environment proofing
better than average battery life (380 shots)
max fps very slow (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
low fps (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Travel photography features
Panasonic FH22 Travel photography features
better than average battery life (380 shots)
environment proofing
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competitors in class (247g)
does not have a selfie friendly display
includes focus by touch
decent megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography information
Panasonic FH22 Landscape photography information
you can focus manually
relatively wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
delivers RAW files
environment proofing
better than average battery life (380 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Vlogging details
Panasonic FH22 Vlogging details
relatively wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not have a selfie friendly display
doesn't have mic support
heavier than competitors in class (247 grams)
pretty wide (28mm)
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic socket
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2015-04-13 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 170 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $379 | $200 |