Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FP8
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FP8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Old Model is Olympus TG-3
- Updated by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 151g - 96 x 60 x 20mm
- Released July 2009
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FP8 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus TG-4 versus Panasonic FP8, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and FP8 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-4 was released 5 years after the FP8 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FP8 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summation of how the TG-4 scores vs the FP8 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FP8 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Panasonic FP8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Panasonic FP8
TG-4 | FP8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2015 | July 2009 | More modern by 70 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP8 over the Olympus TG-4
FP8 | TG-4 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic FP8
TG-4 | FP8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FP8 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-4 has got physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Panasonic FP8 has dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-4 versus Panasonic FP8 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-4 against the FP8.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-4 and FP8 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FP8 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading specifications. The image here should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-4 and FP8.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-4 to deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The newer TG-4 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FP8 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2015-04-13 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 151 gr (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 96 x 60 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $379 | $300 |