Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS42
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-3
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Raise to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Announced April 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic FS42, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") provide different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-4 was unveiled 6 years after the FS42 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the TG-4 grades vs the FS42 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Panasonic FS42
| TG-4 | FS42 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2015 |  | April 2009 | Newer by 73 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus TG-4
| FS42 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic FS42
| TG-4 | FS42 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-4 has exterior measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS42 has measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic FS42 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-4 and the FS42.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-4 and FS42 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specifications. The pic underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-4 and FS42.
To sum up, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-4 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-4 will resolve extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent TG-4 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2015-04-13 | 2009-04-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1000 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 6.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $379 | $580 |