Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-3
- Replacement is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Introduced June 2014
- Later Model is Panasonic FZ2500
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the FZ1000 (20MP) is pretty close but the TG-4 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 (1") possess different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-4 was brought out 11 months later than the FZ1000 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the TG-4 matches up vs the FZ1000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Panasonic FZ1000
TG-4 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2015 | June 2014 | Fresher by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus TG-4
FZ1000 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic FZ1000
TG-4 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-4 offers external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ1000 has specifications of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") accompanied by a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-4 versus the FZ1000.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and FZ1000 is 90 and 55 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing purely by researching specifications. The visual here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-4 and FZ1000.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-4 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Panasonic FZ1000 will result in greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent TG-4 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-04-13 | 2014-06-12 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 831g (1.83 lb) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 images | 360 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $379 | $800 |