Clicky

Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44
Olympus Tough TG-4 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Released April 2015
  • Replaced the Olympus TG-3
  • Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Revealed July 2012
  • Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ100
  • Refreshed by Panasonic FZ300
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

Lets look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-4 versus Panasonic FZ200, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The TG-4 was introduced 2 years later than the FZ200 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-4 matches up vs the FZ200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Panasonic FZ200

 TG-4 FZ200 
RevealedApril 2015July 2012More recent by 34 months

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus TG-4

 FZ200 TG-4 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic FZ200

 TG-4 FZ200 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Screen resolution460k460kSame screen resolution
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-4 features outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") having a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus TG-4 versus Panasonic FZ200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-4 vs the FZ200.

Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and FZ200 is 90 and 65 respectively.

Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching a spec sheet. The visual here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and FZ200.

Clearly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-4 to provide you with greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger TG-4 will have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography information
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography information
46
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
provides face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
48
you can focus manually
great flash sync speed (1/4,000s)
has face detect focus
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Street photography factors
Panasonic FZ200 Street photography factors
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
weather proofing
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
more heavy than competitors (247g)
57
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
small sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than average in class (588 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Sports photography highlights
Panasonic FZ200 Sports photography highlights
47
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
weather proofing
good battery (380 CIPA)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
46
great zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking focus
good battery (540 CIPA)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-4 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Travel photography camera
74
good battery (380 per charge)
weather proofing
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competitors (247g)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
55
good battery (540 shots)
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
really wide (25mm)
very long reach (600mm)
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than average in class (588g)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic FZ200 Landscape photography factors
62
manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
saves RAW formats
weather proofing
good battery (380 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
48
you can focus manually
really wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
good battery (540 per charge)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
missing Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Vlogging information
Panasonic FZ200 Vlogging information
34
reasonably wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone support
more heavy than competitors (247 grams)
63
really wide (25mm)
selfie friendly screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
comes with microphone jack
slow max aperture (f2.8)
more heavy than average in class (588g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus Tough TG-4Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus Tough TG-4 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2015-04-13 2012-07-18
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Highest boosted ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 25 23
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,312 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 5.0 frames per sec 12.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) 13.50 m
Flash options Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 247 grams (0.54 lbs) 588 grams (1.30 lbs)
Physical dimensions 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 37
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 19.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.8
DXO Low light rating not tested 114
Other
Battery life 380 images 540 images
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-92B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $379 $499