Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44


65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Revealed July 2012
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Refreshed by Panasonic FZ300

Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-4 versus Panasonic FZ200, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The TG-4 was introduced 2 years later than the FZ200 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-4 matches up vs the FZ200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Panasonic FZ200
TG-4 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2015 | ![]() | July 2012 | More recent by 34 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus TG-4
FZ200 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic FZ200
TG-4 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Same screen resolution |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-4 features outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") having a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-4 versus Panasonic FZ200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-4 vs the FZ200.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and FZ200 is 90 and 65 respectively.

Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching a spec sheet. The visual here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and FZ200.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-4 to provide you with greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger TG-4 will have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-04-13 | 2012-07-18 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 13.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 588 grams (1.30 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 images | 540 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $379 | $499 |