Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ28
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Portability
72 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
72 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ28 Key Specs
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Replacement is Olympus TG-5
Panasonic FZ28
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 417g - 118 x 75 x 89mm
- Introduced January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ28 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ28, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and FZ28 (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-4 was brought out 6 years after the FZ28 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the TG-4 matches up versus the FZ28 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ28 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Panasonic FZ28 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Panasonic FZ28
| TG-4 | FZ28 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2015 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 76 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ28 over the Olympus TG-4
| FZ28 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic FZ28
| TG-4 | FZ28 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ28 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-4 offers external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ28 has sizing of 118mm x 75mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") along with a weight of 417 grams (0.92 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ28 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-4 compared to the FZ28.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and FZ28 is 90 and 72 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ28 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching specs. The pic below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-4 and FZ28.
All in all, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-4 to provide you with more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher TG-4 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ28 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography information
Panasonic FZ28 Portrait photography information
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has face detect focusing
exports RAW files
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
you can focus manually
delivers RAW formats
no external flash support
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Street photography factors
Panasonic FZ28 Street photography factors
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
environment proof
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition in class (247g)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography advice
Panasonic FZ28 Sports photography advice
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has tracking focus
environment proof
better than average battery power (380 per charge)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (27-486mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
low MP (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Travel photography factors
Panasonic FZ28 Travel photography factors
better than average battery power (380 CIPA)
environment proof
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competition in class (247 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
has built in flash
really wide (27mm)
great reach (486mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
low MP (10MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography information
Panasonic FZ28 Landscape photography information
focusing manually
really wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
exports RAW files
environment proof
better than average battery power (380 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
you can focus manually
really wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
low MP (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse mode
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Vlogging highlights
Panasonic FZ28 Vlogging highlights
really wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (247g)
really wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic socket
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ28 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2015-04-13 | 2009-01-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-4.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 8.50 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Red-Eye Auto, On, Red-Eye On, Red-Eye Slow Sync, Off, Slow Sync (1&2) |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps, 848 x 480, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 @ 30fps, 320 x 240 @ 10fps |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 417 gr (0.92 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 118 x 75 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 27 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 17.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 79 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $379 | $599 |
