Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic SZ5
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
95 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic SZ5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Older Model is Olympus TG-3
- Renewed by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 136g - 104 x 58 x 21mm
- Announced July 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic SZ5 Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic SZ5, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the SZ5 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe TG-4 was unveiled 2 years later than the SZ5 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the TG-4 matches up against the SZ5 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic SZ5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ5. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Panasonic SZ5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Panasonic SZ5
| TG-4 | SZ5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2015 | July 2012 | Fresher by 34 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ5 over the Olympus TG-4
| SZ5 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic SZ5
| TG-4 | SZ5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic SZ5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-4 has exterior measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Panasonic SZ5 has measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 21mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic SZ5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-4 and the SZ5.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and SZ5 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic SZ5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-4 and SZ5.
Clearly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-4 to give more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent TG-4 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic SZ5 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic SZ5 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ5 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2015-04-13 | 2012-07-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Screen LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720p ( 30,25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 136 grams (0.30 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 104 x 58 x 21mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 shots | 250 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $379 | $195 |