Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Efina
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
97 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Efina Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 91g - 87 x 54 x 21mm
- Launched June 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Efina Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus TG-4 versus Pentax Efina, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the Efina (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-4 was revealed 23 months later than the Efina which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Efina being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the TG-4 scores against the Efina in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Efina Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Pentax Efina. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Pentax Efina Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Pentax Efina
| TG-4 | Efina | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 |  | June 2013 | More recent by 23 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax Efina over the Olympus TG-4
| Efina | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Pentax Efina
| TG-4 | Efina | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Efina Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-4 has physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Pentax Efina has specifications of 87mm x 54mm x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 91 grams (0.20 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-4 versus Pentax Efina in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-4 compared to the Efina.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-4 and Efina is 90 and 97 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Efina Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching specs. The graphic below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and Efina.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Olympus TG-4 to render extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern TG-4 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Efina Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Efina Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Efina | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Efina |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2015-04-13 | 2013-06-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 20cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 91g (0.20 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 87 x 54 x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | 200 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | D-LI109 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $379 | $10 |