Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Efina
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
97 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Efina Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 91g - 87 x 54 x 21mm
- Launched June 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Efina Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus TG-4 versus Pentax Efina, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the Efina (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe TG-4 was revealed 23 months later than the Efina which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Efina being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the TG-4 scores against the Efina in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Efina Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Pentax Efina. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Pentax Efina Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Pentax Efina
| TG-4 | Efina | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 |  | June 2013 | More recent by 23 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax Efina over the Olympus TG-4
| Efina | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Pentax Efina
| TG-4 | Efina | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Efina Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-4 has physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Pentax Efina has specifications of 87mm x 54mm x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 91 grams (0.20 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-4 versus Pentax Efina in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-4 compared to the Efina.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-4 and Efina is 90 and 97 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Efina Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching specs. The graphic below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and Efina.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Olympus TG-4 to render extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern TG-4 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Efina Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Efina Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Efina | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Efina |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2015-04-13 | 2013-06-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 20cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 91g (0.20 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 87 x 54 x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | 200 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | D-LI109 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $379 | $10 |
