Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f10a/6f10a47131c9d5756aa9d066ef058620213d1e35" alt="Pentax K-30 front Pentax K-30 front"
63 Imaging
57 Features
66 Overall
60
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 650g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Announced October 2012
- Later Model is Pentax K-50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the K-30 (16MP) is very well matched but the TG-4 (1/2.3") and K-30 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The TG-4 was brought out 2 years later than the K-30 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the TG-4 grades versus the K-30 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Pentax K-30. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Pentax K-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Pentax K-30
TG-4 | K-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2015 | ![]() | October 2012 | Fresher by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-30 over the Olympus TG-4
K-30 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Pentax K-30
TG-4 | K-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-4 has got physical measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Pentax K-30 has specifications of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") having a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-4 and the K-30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eeefd/eeefdb32d7467ad95b87b8caf33a25a2764a70ad" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30 size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and K-30 is 90 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67676/676769bd2e40f9ec6062e0f6ffa3abf0045fad73" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by looking at specifications. The visual here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-4 and K-30.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide the same resolution but not the same sensor sizing. The TG-4 contains the tinier sensor which should make getting shallower depth of field more difficult. The newer TG-4 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08b71/08b718d54e9b26aad90ba6c239da412cf6416f74" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6ab5/d6ab55a243ae896a512470fdf165f0b79e5dd9f2" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K-30 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax K-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax K-30 |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2015-04-13 | 2012-10-29 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Prime M |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye,Slow Sync, Slow Sync+ Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 650 grams (1.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 images | 410 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | D-LI109,4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $379 | $525 |