Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Replacement is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Launched December 2006
- Replacement is Pentax K20D
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and K10D (10MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and K10D (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-4 was unveiled 8 years after the K10D which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K10D being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the TG-4 scores against the K10D with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Pentax K10D. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Pentax K10D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Pentax K10D
| TG-4 | K10D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 | December 2006 | Newer by 102 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 210k | Clearer display (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K10D over the Olympus TG-4
| K10D | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Pentax K10D
| TG-4 | K10D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-4 features physical measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Pentax K10D has proportions of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the TG-4 vs the K10D.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and K10D is 90 and 59 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions only by checking out technical specs. The image below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-4 and K10D.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-4 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus TG-4 will produce greater detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger TG-4 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax K10D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax K10D |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2015-04-13 | 2006-12-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 210k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Auto Red Eye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 793 grams (1.75 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 522 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $379 | $700 |