Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Replacement is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Launched December 2006
- Replacement is Pentax K20D
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and K10D (10MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and K10D (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-4 was unveiled 8 years after the K10D which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K10D being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the TG-4 scores against the K10D with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Pentax K10D. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Pentax K10D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Pentax K10D
TG-4 | K10D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2015 | December 2006 | Newer by 102 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 210k | Clearer display (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K10D over the Olympus TG-4
K10D | TG-4 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Pentax K10D
TG-4 | K10D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-4 features physical measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Pentax K10D has proportions of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the TG-4 vs the K10D.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and K10D is 90 and 59 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions only by checking out technical specs. The image below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-4 and K10D.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-4 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus TG-4 will produce greater detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger TG-4 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax K10D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax K10D |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2015-04-13 | 2006-12-15 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 210k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Auto Red Eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 793 grams (1.75 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 522 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $379 | $700 |