Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Replacement is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Launched December 2006
- Replacement is Pentax K20D
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and K10D (10MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and K10D (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-4 was unveiled 8 years after the K10D which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K10D being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the TG-4 scores against the K10D with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Pentax K10D. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Pentax K10D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Pentax K10D
| TG-4 | K10D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 | December 2006 | Newer by 102 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 210k | Clearer display (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K10D over the Olympus TG-4
| K10D | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Pentax K10D
| TG-4 | K10D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-4 features physical measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Pentax K10D has proportions of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the TG-4 vs the K10D.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and K10D is 90 and 59 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions only by checking out technical specs. The image below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-4 and K10D.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-4 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus TG-4 will produce greater detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger TG-4 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax K10D Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax K10D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax K10D |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2015-04-13 | 2006-12-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 210k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Auto Red Eye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 793 grams (1.75 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 522 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $379 | $700 |