Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax E90
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
94 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax E90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-95mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 145g - 102 x 59 x 25mm
- Announced January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax E90 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Olympus TG-4 versus Pentax E90, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and E90 (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-4 was announced 5 years later than the E90 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the TG-4 scores against the E90 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax E90 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Pentax Optio E90. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Pentax E90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Pentax E90
| TG-4 | E90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2015 | January 2010 | Fresher by 64 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax E90 over the Olympus TG-4
| E90 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Pentax E90
| TG-4 | E90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax E90 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-4 enjoys exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Pentax E90 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-4 versus Pentax E90 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-4 versus the E90.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and E90 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax E90 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through technical specs. The visual below will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-4 and E90.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-4 to resolve more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern TG-4 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax E90 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax E90 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Optio E90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Optio E90 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2015-04-13 | 2010-01-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | Prime |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 32-95mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 145 gr (0.32 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 102 x 59 x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $379 | $100 |