Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax E90
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
94 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax E90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-95mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 145g - 102 x 59 x 25mm
- Announced January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax E90 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Olympus TG-4 versus Pentax E90, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and E90 (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-4 was announced 5 years later than the E90 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the TG-4 scores against the E90 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax E90 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Pentax Optio E90. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Pentax E90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Pentax E90
| TG-4 | E90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2015 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 64 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax E90 over the Olympus TG-4
| E90 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Pentax E90
| TG-4 | E90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax E90 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-4 enjoys exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Pentax E90 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-4 versus Pentax E90 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-4 versus the E90.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and E90 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax E90 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through technical specs. The visual below will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-4 and E90.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-4 to resolve more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern TG-4 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax E90 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax E90 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Optio E90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Optio E90 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2015-04-13 | 2010-01-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | Prime |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 32-95mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 145 gr (0.32 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 102 x 59 x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $379 | $100 |