Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax RZ10
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Portability
92 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
92 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax RZ10 Key Specs
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-3
- Renewed by Olympus TG-5
Pentax RZ10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Released July 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax RZ10 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax RZ10, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the RZ10 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-4 was brought out 3 years after the RZ10 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the TG-4 scores against the RZ10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax RZ10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Pentax Optio RZ10. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Pentax RZ10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Pentax RZ10
| TG-4 | RZ10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2015 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 46 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ10 over the Olympus TG-4
| RZ10 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Pentax RZ10
| TG-4 | RZ10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax RZ10 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-4 has got physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Pentax RZ10 has sizing of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax RZ10 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-4 and the RZ10.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and RZ10 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax RZ10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through a spec sheet. The pic here may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-4 and RZ10.
Clearly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-4 to provide extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent TG-4 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax RZ10 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-4
Portrait photography with Pentax RZ10
manual focus
good MP (16MP)
supports face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
you can focus manually
good megapixels (14MP)
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Street photography info
Pentax RZ10 Street photography info
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
environment proofing
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
more heavy than others (247 grams)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography details
Pentax RZ10 Sports photography details
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
great battery pack (380 CIPA)
slow fps (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
slow frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery (178 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus TG-4
Travel photography with Pentax RZ10
great battery pack (380 per charge)
environment proofing
good MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than others (247g)
does not have a selfie friendly display
environment proofing
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
long zoom (280mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
bad battery (178 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography info
Pentax RZ10 Landscape photography info
manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
supports RAW formats
environment proofing
great battery pack (380 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
you can focus manually
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
environment proofing
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
bad battery (178 shots)
does not have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Vlogging information
Pentax RZ10 Vlogging information
decently wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
lack of microphone socket
more heavy than others (247 grams)
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax RZ10 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Optio RZ10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2015-04-13 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 2.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 178 gr (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | 178 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $379 | $200 |