Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh CX2
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- Replacement is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-4 versus Ricoh CX2, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-4 was brought out 5 years later than the CX2 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the TG-4 matches up versus the CX2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Ricoh CX2. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Ricoh CX2
| TG-4 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2015 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 69 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus TG-4
| CX2 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh CX2
| TG-4 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-4 comes with external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-4 versus Ricoh CX2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the TG-4 and the CX2.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and CX2 is 90 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching specs. The visual below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-4 and CX2.
All in all, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus TG-4 to provide you with extra detail having its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger TG-4 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2015-04-13 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 185g (0.41 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $379 | $341 |