Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh CX3
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh CX3, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-4 was introduced 4 years after the CX3 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-4 matches up versus the CX3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Ricoh CX3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Ricoh CX3
| TG-4 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 59 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Olympus TG-4
| CX3 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh CX3
| TG-4 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-4 features outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh CX3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the TG-4 vs the CX3.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and CX3 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by researching technical specs. The picture underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-4 and CX3.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Olympus TG-4 to render greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent TG-4 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2015-04-13 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $379 | $329 |