Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh G900
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Portability
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5
Ricoh G900
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh G900, both Waterproof cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the G900 (20MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-4 was introduced 3 years earlier than the G900 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the TG-4 grades against the G900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Ricoh G900. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Ricoh G900
| TG-4 | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Olympus TG-4
| G900 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 |  | April 2015 | More recent by 34 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh G900
| TG-4 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-4 offers outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh G900 has proportions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh G900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-4 vs the G900.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and G900 is 90 and 89 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The visual here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-4 and G900.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh G900 to produce more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The older TG-4 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography features
Ricoh G900 Portrait photography features
manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
offers face detect focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus TG-4
Street photography with Ricoh G900
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (247g)
image stabilization (Digital)
environment proofing
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
heavier than average in class (247g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus TG-4
Sports photography with Ricoh G900
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
includes tracking focus
weather sealing
good battery (380 CIPA)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Digital)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
environment proofing
great battery life (340 per charge)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-4 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh G900 as a Travel photography camera
good battery (380 per charge)
weather sealing
good MP (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competition (247g)
display is not selfie friendly
great battery life (340 per charge)
environment proofing
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
heavier than average in class (247g)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-4 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh G900 as a Landscape photography camera
manual focus
relatively wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
good battery (380 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
you can focus manually
really wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Digital)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
environment proofing
great battery life (340 CIPA)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Vlogging factors
Ricoh G900 Vlogging factors
relatively wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone jack
more heavy than competition (247g)
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
offers face detect focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
no mic jack
heavier than average in class (247 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh G900 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2015-04-13 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | BuiltIn | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | 340 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $379 | $752 |
