Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR II
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Portability
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Released June 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh GR
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR II Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR II, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the GR II (16MP) is pretty similar but the TG-4 (1/2.3") and GR II (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-4 was launched 2 months prior to the GR II which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the TG-4 grades versus the GR II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Ricoh GR II. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Ricoh GR II
| TG-4 | GR II |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus TG-4
| GR II | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh GR II
| TG-4 | GR II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2015 |  | June 2015 | Similar generation |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-4 provides physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Ricoh GR II has sizing of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR II in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the TG-4 against the GR II.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-4 and GR II is 90 and 89 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by going over a spec sheet. The picture below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and GR II.
Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count albeit different sensor dimensions. The TG-4 provides the tinier sensor which is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging.
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography info
Ricoh GR II Portrait photography info
focusing manually
MP count good (16MP)
includes face detect focus
saves RAW formats
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
focusing manually
MP count decent (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Street photography factors
Ricoh GR II Street photography factors
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition in class (247 grams)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lighter than others in class (251 grams)
very good high ISO (25,600)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography factors
Ricoh GR II Sports photography factors
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
weather sealing
good battery (380 CIPA)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers tracking autofocus
can't change focal length (28mm)
low frames per second (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus TG-4
Travel photography with Ricoh GR II
good battery (380 shots)
weather sealing
MP count good (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competition in class (247 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
lighter than others in class (251 grams)
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-4
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR II
focusing manually
quite wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
good battery (380 CIPA)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
focusing manually
nice screen size (3 inch)
MP count decent (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
does not have Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-4 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GR II as a Vlogging camera
quite wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
does not have microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (247g)
offers face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others in class (251g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
does not have external mic port
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh GR II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh GR II |
| Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2015-04-13 | 2015-06-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | GR Engine V |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-16.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 300 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 251 gr (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1078 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | 320 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $379 | $599 |