Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
77 Imaging
51 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Old Model is Olympus TG-3
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-4 was manufactured 5 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the TG-4 matches up against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| TG-4 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2015 | November 2009 | Fresher by 66 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus TG-4
| GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| TG-4 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-4 has got exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-4 versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 90 and 77 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
All in all, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-4 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus TG-4 will provide you with more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger TG-4 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2015-04-13 | 2009-11-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 453g (1.00 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | 320 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $379 | $566 |