Clicky

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44
Olympus Tough TG-4 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
51
Features
31
Overall
43

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Revealed April 2015
  • Old Model is Olympus TG-3
  • Refreshed by Olympus TG-5
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Revealed November 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Here is a thorough overview of the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The TG-4 was manufactured 5 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the TG-4 matches up against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 TG-4 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
RevealedApril 2015November 2009Fresher by 66 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus TG-4

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro TG-4 
Display resolution920k460kClearer display (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 TG-4 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display size
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-4 has got exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Check out the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-4 versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 90 and 77 respectively.

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

All in all, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-4 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus TG-4 will provide you with more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger TG-4 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography factors
46
focusing manually
MP count good (16MP)
features face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
54
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
MP count low (12 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Street photography features
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography features
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (247g)
61
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-4 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Sports photography camera
47
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
features tracking focus
environment sealing
good battery power (380 shots)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
31
nice sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (50mm)
doesn't have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
terrible battery pack (320 shots)
no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-4 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Travel photography camera
74
good battery power (380 CIPA)
environment sealing
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competition (247 grams)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
49
flash built-in
terrible battery pack (320 shots)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-4 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Landscape photography camera
62
focusing manually
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
good battery power (380 CIPA)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
46
you can focus manually
screen size is good (3 inch)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (50mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
terrible battery pack (320 CIPA)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging highlights
34
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
doesn't have mic port
heavier than competition (247g)
20
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic support
Photography Glossary

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Olympus Tough TG-4Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus Tough TG-4 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Type Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2015-04-13 2009-11-10
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII GR engine III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 2848
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 50mm (1x)
Max aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/2.5
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 460 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 180 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/3200 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 5.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 247g (0.54 pounds) 453g (1.00 pounds)
Dimensions 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 380 photos 320 photos
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-92B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $379 $566