Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44


84 Imaging
52 Features
39 Overall
46
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Old Model is Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Revealed August 2011

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.

The TG-4 was released 3 years later than the GXR Mount A12 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the TG-4 matches up vs the GXR Mount A12 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
TG-4 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2015 | ![]() | August 2011 | Fresher by 45 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Olympus TG-4
GXR Mount A12 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
TG-4 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-4 offers outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has dimensions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-4 versus the GXR Mount A12.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and GXR Mount A12 is 90 and 84 respectively.

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by looking at technical specs. The visual below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-4 and GXR Mount A12.
As you can tell, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-4 due to its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Olympus TG-4 will give more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images more aggressively. The newer TG-4 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2015-04-13 | 2011-08-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/9000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 9.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 370 grams (0.82 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photographs | 330 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $379 | $349 |