Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44


85 Imaging
33 Features
48 Overall
39
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Announced August 2010

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-4 versus Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The TG-4 was announced 4 years later than the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the TG-4 matches up against the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
TG-4 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2015 | ![]() | August 2010 | More recent by 58 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Olympus TG-4
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
TG-4 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-4 comes with physical measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-4 versus Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the TG-4 compared to the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 90 and 85 respectively.

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements purely by going over specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-4 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus TG-4 to deliver extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern TG-4 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2015-04-13 | 2010-08-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 367g (0.81 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 pictures | 440 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $379 | $147 |