Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-30W
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-30W, both Waterproof digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the WG-30W (16MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-4 was revealed 7 months later than the WG-30W and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TG-4 grades vs the WG-30W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Ricoh WG-30W. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| TG-4 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 |  | October 2014 | Fresher by 7 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Olympus TG-4
| WG-30W | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh WG-30W
| TG-4 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-4 provides exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30W has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-30W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the TG-4 and the WG-30W.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and WG-30W is 90 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing only by checking technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and WG-30W.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same megapixels and you should expect similar quality of images although you need to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The more modern TG-4 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2015-04-13 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 shots | 300 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $379 | $280 |