Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62a6a/62a6a983a6af3568f6b39137b109a895b4f78a46" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front"
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty similar and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The TG-4 was announced 8 months later than the WG-M1 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the TG-4 grades vs the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Ricoh WG-M1
TG-4 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2015 | ![]() | September 2014 | More recent by 8 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper screen (+345k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus TG-4
WG-M1 | TG-4 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh WG-M1
TG-4 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-4 provides exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-4 against the WG-M1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6e3c/f6e3c753394643e3de88a27e391f40d23e6b9976" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and WG-M1 is 90 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22f9e/22f9eef6a084356f1057725e117e4a810c9c9f97" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The photograph below may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and WG-M1.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus TG-4 to deliver greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively. The younger TG-4 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44d4d/44d4df86b9060e9012bb031a9b3f610c4622f3ef" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9540c/9540cdc07fc02d3a470c9f32f51f0a4f896967aa" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Released | 2015-04-13 | 2014-09-12 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | (1×) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 1.5" |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 115k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 pictures | 350 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $379 | $2,000 |