Clicky

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1

Portability
90
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45
Olympus Tough TG-4 front
 
Ricoh WG-M1 front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
22
Overall
32

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs

Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Released April 2015
  • Previous Model is Olympus TG-3
  • Successor is Olympus TG-5
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Introduced September 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview

Lets look much closer at the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty similar and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The TG-4 was announced 8 months later than the WG-M1 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the TG-4 grades vs the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Ricoh WG-M1

 TG-4 WG-M1 
IntroducedApril 2015September 2014More recent by 8 months
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Screen dimension3"1.5"Bigger screen (+1.5")
Screen resolution460k115kCrisper screen (+345k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus TG-4

 WG-M1 TG-4 

Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh WG-M1

 TG-4 WG-M1 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-4 provides exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Compare the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-4 against the WG-M1.

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and WG-M1 is 90 and 91 respectively.

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The photograph below may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and WG-M1.

As you have seen, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus TG-4 to deliver greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively. The younger TG-4 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography advice
47
manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focusing
saves RAW files
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
30
MP count good (14MP)
no manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Street photography info
Ricoh WG-M1 Street photography info
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
weather sealing
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
heavier than others (247g)
53
environment proof
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
low maximum ISO (800)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh WG-M1 Sports photography highlights
48
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
weather sealing
good battery (380 shots)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
38
MP count good (14 megapixels)
environment proof
better than average battery pack (350 per charge)
fixed focal length ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Travel photography features
Ricoh WG-M1 Travel photography features
74
good battery (380 shots)
weather sealing
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
heavier than others (247g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
64
better than average battery pack (350 shots)
environment proof
MP count good (14 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
does not contain selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh WG-M1 Landscape photography factors
62
manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
saves RAW files
weather sealing
good battery (380 shots)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not available
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
35
MP count good (14 megapixels)
environment proof
better than average battery pack (350 CIPA)
no manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length ((1×)mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (1.5")
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (800)
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Vlogging factors
Ricoh WG-M1 Vlogging factors
34
reasonably wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no external mic socket
heavier than others (247 grams)
26
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh WG-M1
 Olympus Tough TG-4Ricoh WG-M1
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus Tough TG-4 Ricoh WG-M1
Type Waterproof Waterproof
Released 2015-04-13 2014-09-12
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 6400 800
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) (1×)
Maximum aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/2.8
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 1.5"
Resolution of display 460k dot 115k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s -
Max shutter speed 1/2000s -
Continuous shutter speed 5.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 247 grams (0.54 pounds) 190 grams (0.42 pounds)
Dimensions 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 380 pictures 350 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-92B DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory microSD/microSDHC, internal
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $379 $2,000