Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ15W
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Portability
90 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
90 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
Samsung HZ15W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also referred to as WB550
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-4 and Samsung HZ15W, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and HZ15W (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-4 was revealed 6 years after the HZ15W which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the TG-4 matches up against the HZ15W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Samsung HZ15W. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Samsung HZ15W
| TG-4 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 75 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Olympus TG-4
| HZ15W | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Samsung HZ15W
| TG-4 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-4 has got outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung HZ15W has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-4 and Samsung HZ15W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-4 and the HZ15W.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-4 and HZ15W is 90 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and HZ15W.
Clearly, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-4 to provide you with more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The newer TG-4 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography advice
Samsung HZ15W Portrait photography advice
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
has face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
you can focus manually
includes face detect autofocus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Street photography factors
Samsung HZ15W Street photography factors
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
heavier than average in class (247g)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than competitors (249 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Olympus TG-4 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung HZ15W as a Sports photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
weather sealing
better than average battery life (380 per charge)
slow frames per second (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Travel photography features
Samsung HZ15W Travel photography features
better than average battery life (380 per charge)
weather sealing
good MP (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
heavier than average in class (247g)
display is not selfie friendly
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (249 grams)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-4
Landscape photography with Samsung HZ15W
has manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
better than average battery life (380 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
you can focus manually
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual exposure
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-4
Vlogging with Samsung HZ15W
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have mic port
heavier than average in class (247g)
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic jack
heavier than competitors (249 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Samsung HZ15W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Samsung HZ15W |
| Also called | - | WB550 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2015-04-13 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 249 grams (0.55 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $379 | $330 |
