Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Old Model is Olympus TG-3
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Launched July 2010
- Alternative Name is WB5000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-4 versus Samsung HZ25W, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and HZ25W (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-4 was released 4 years after the HZ25W which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the TG-4 grades versus the HZ25W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Samsung HZ25W. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Samsung HZ25W
| TG-4 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 59 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus TG-4
| HZ25W | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Samsung HZ25W
| TG-4 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-4 provides outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ25W has proportions of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-4 versus Samsung HZ25W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-4 against the HZ25W.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and HZ25W is 90 and 70 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by going over specifications. The picture here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and HZ25W.
Plainly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-4 to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher TG-4 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB5000 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2015-04-13 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lb) | 428 grams (0.94 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $379 | $350 |