Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung SL30
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-3
- Renewed by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also Known as ES15
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung SL30 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung SL30, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and SL30 (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-4 was introduced 6 years later than the SL30 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the TG-4 grades versus the SL30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung SL30 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Samsung SL30. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Samsung SL30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Samsung SL30
| TG-4 | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 | February 2009 | More recent by 75 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Olympus TG-4
| SL30 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Samsung SL30
| TG-4 | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung SL30 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-4 has got exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung SL30 has measurements of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung SL30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-4 and the SL30.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and SL30 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung SL30 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by researching a spec sheet. The visual below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and SL30.
As you can see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-4 to provide you with more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent TG-4 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung SL30 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung SL30 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Samsung SL30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Samsung SL30 |
| Also referred to as | - | ES15 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2015-04-13 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 140g (0.31 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $379 | $93 |