Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung WB50F
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Older Model is Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Launched January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung WB50F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe TG-4 was introduced 16 months after the WB50F which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the TG-4 matches up versus the WB50F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Samsung WB50F. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Samsung WB50F
| TG-4 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 | January 2014 | Newer by 16 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Olympus TG-4
| WB50F | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Samsung WB50F
| TG-4 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-4 has got physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has sizing of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung WB50F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the TG-4 vs the WB50F.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and WB50F is 90 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specifications. The image underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-4 and WB50F.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of files but you will need to consider the release date of the cameras into account. The more modern TG-4 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Samsung WB50F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2015-04-13 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lb) | 207 grams (0.46 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $379 | $180 |