Clicky

Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44
Olympus Tough TG-4 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Revealed April 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
  • Later Model is Olympus TG-5
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Launched February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. The image resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is pretty similar but the TG-4 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The TG-4 was released 15 months later than the DP2 Quattro which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the TG-4 matches up vs the DP2 Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 TG-4 DP2 Quattro 
LaunchedApril 2015February 2014More recent by 15 months

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus TG-4

 DP2 Quattro TG-4 
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 TG-4 DP2 Quattro 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-4 provides outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Compare the Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-4 vs the DP2 Quattro.

Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-4 and DP2 Quattro is 90 and 70 respectively.

Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and DP2 Quattro.

As you can see, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-4 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger TG-4 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus TG-4
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
46
has manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focus
supports RAW files
manual mode not available
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
77
has manual focus
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-4 as a Street photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Street photography camera
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competitors (247 grams)
61
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Sports photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography highlights
47
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
environment sealing
better than average battery pack (380 CIPA)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
47
decent MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Travel photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography details
74
better than average battery pack (380 shots)
environment sealing
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competitors (247 grams)
does not offer selfie friendly display
53
decent MP (20 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-4 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
62
has manual focus
fairly wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
better than average battery pack (380 per charge)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
59
has manual focus
screen size is good (3")
decent MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-4 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Vlogging camera
34
fairly wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not offer selfie friendly display
no external microphone support
more heavy than competitors (247g)
9
can't shoot video
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-4 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Olympus Tough TG-4Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Make Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus Tough TG-4 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Class Waterproof Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2015-04-13 2014-02-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII TRUE III engine
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) 45mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 5.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 247 grams (0.54 lb) 395 grams (0.87 lb)
Dimensions 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 380 photographs -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID LI-92B BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory -
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $379 $931