Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Launched February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. The image resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is pretty similar but the TG-4 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-4 was released 15 months later than the DP2 Quattro which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the TG-4 matches up vs the DP2 Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| TG-4 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 | February 2014 | More recent by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus TG-4
| DP2 Quattro | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| TG-4 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-4 provides outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-4 vs the DP2 Quattro.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-4 and DP2 Quattro is 90 and 70 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and DP2 Quattro.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-4 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger TG-4 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2015-04-13 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lb) | 395 grams (0.87 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $379 | $931 |