Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD14
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
59 Imaging
42 Features
30 Overall
37
Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD14 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- New Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Announced September 2006
- Superseded the Sigma SD10
- Later Model is Sigma SD15
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD14 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-4 and Sigma SD14, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and SD14 (5MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and SD14 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-4 was unveiled 8 years after the SD14 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD14 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the TG-4 grades versus the SD14 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD14 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Sigma SD14. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Sigma SD14 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Sigma SD14
| TG-4 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2015 | September 2006 | Newer by 105 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 150k | Sharper screen (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD14 over the Olympus TG-4
| SD14 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Sigma SD14
| TG-4 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD14 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-4 offers exterior measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sigma SD14 has proportions of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") and a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-4 and Sigma SD14 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the TG-4 versus the SD14.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and SD14 is 90 and 59 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD14 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through specs. The picture below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-4 and SD14.
All in all, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-4 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus TG-4 will produce greater detail having an extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher TG-4 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD14 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD14 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sigma SD14 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sigma SD14 |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2015-04-13 | 2006-09-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 5MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 150k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 750 gr (1.65 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $379 | $198 |