Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A200
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
66 Imaging
50 Features
38 Overall
45
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Introduced July 2008
- Refreshed by Sony A230
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A200 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus TG-4 versus Sony A200, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-4 was brought out 6 years after the A200 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the TG-4 matches up vs the A200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Sony A200
| TG-4 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2015 |  | July 2008 | More modern by 83 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus TG-4
| A200 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Sony A200
| TG-4 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-4 has got external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-4 versus Sony A200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-4 against the A200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and A200 is 90 and 66 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through a spec sheet. The image underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and A200.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-4 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus TG-4 will provide you with greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher TG-4 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2015-04-13 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lb) | 572 grams (1.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $379 | $100 |
