Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc9a0/cc9a0ca2125609e674d299e5b8108d0775ff4eee" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-3
- New Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Launched July 2010
- Previous Model is Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the A390 (14MP) is very similar but the TG-4 (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-4 was announced 4 years after the A390 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the TG-4 matches up versus the A390 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Sony A390
TG-4 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2015 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 58 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus TG-4
A390 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Sony A390
TG-4 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-4 comes with outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") and a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the TG-4 versus the A390.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55f34/55f346e4bd0fabbbb8c05b8cff4d99640bec3559" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390 size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-4 and A390 is 90 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23fee/23feebff5ed04fe580cfc578ef99f8463d8f1b11" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over technical specs. The picture here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and A390.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-4 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus TG-4 will offer you more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The fresher TG-4 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c67e/0c67ede846742b8db45fab39fd9e84bfa1d34159" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/962a0/962a00d117649d924f745fd1f7cacff95014d2f8" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2015-04-13 | 2010-07-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 549g (1.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 shots | 230 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $379 | $500 |