Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A900
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
54 Imaging
67 Features
62 Overall
65
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched April 2015
- Old Model is Olympus TG-3
- Updated by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Launched October 2008
- Newer Model is Sony A99
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A900 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A900, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and A900 (25MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) possess different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-4 was manufactured 6 years later than the A900 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the TG-4 scores versus the A900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Sony A900
| TG-4 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 |  | October 2008 | Fresher by 79 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Olympus TG-4
| A900 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Sony A900
| TG-4 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-4 has external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has specifications of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-4 vs the A900.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and A900 is 90 and 54 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading a spec sheet. The graphic here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-4 and A900.
Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-4 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony A900 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent TG-4 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A900 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2015-04-13 | 2008-10-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 25 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6048 x 4032 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 895 gr (1.97 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | 880 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Storage slots | One | Two |
| Retail pricing | $379 | $2,736 |
