Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H90
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
91 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H90 Key Specs
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Replacement is Olympus TG-5
Sony H90
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 222g - 105 x 60 x 34mm
- Announced February 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H90 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus TG-4 and Sony H90, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the H90 (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observationsThe TG-4 was announced 3 years after the H90 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-4 grades versus the H90 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H90 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Sony H90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Sony H90
| TG-4 | H90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2015 |  | February 2012 | More modern by 38 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony H90 over the Olympus TG-4
| H90 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Sony H90
| TG-4 | H90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H90 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-4 provides external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony H90 has sizing of 105mm x 60mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-4 and Sony H90 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-4 versus the H90.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and H90 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H90 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The image here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-4 and H90.
Plainly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of images but you should factor the age of the cameras into account. The newer TG-4 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H90 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-4
Portrait photography with Sony H90
you can focus manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
decent MP (16 megapixels)
features face detection focus
no manual focus
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Street photography factors
Sony H90 Street photography factors
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
environment proof
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competitors (247g)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (222g)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography factors
Sony H90 Sports photography factors
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
environment proof
better than average battery power (380 CIPA)
max frames per second low (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (24-384mm 16.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus TG-4
Travel photography with Sony H90
better than average battery power (380 shots)
environment proof
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competitors (247g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
lighter than competition in class (222g)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (384mm)
lack of Timelapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography info
Sony H90 Landscape photography info
you can focus manually
really wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
exports RAW formats
environment proof
better than average battery power (380 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-4
Vlogging with Sony H90
really wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone port
more heavy than competitors (247g)
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focus
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone socket
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H90 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2015-04-13 | 2012-02-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 222g (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 105 x 60 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | 290 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $379 | $230 |
