Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef3ef/ef3ef6db878f09ebdcfc7b9bfb9837bae64cabe2" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 front"
58 Imaging
51 Features
76 Overall
61
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- Updated by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Newer Model is Sony RX10 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus TG-4 versus Sony RX10, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the RX10 (20MP) is fairly well matched but the TG-4 (1/2.3") and RX10 (1") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The TG-4 was released 13 months later than the RX10 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the TG-4 matches up vs the RX10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Sony RX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Sony RX10
TG-4 | RX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2015 | ![]() | March 2014 | More recent by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 over the Olympus TG-4
RX10 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1290k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+830k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Sony RX10
TG-4 | RX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-4 enjoys external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony RX10 has dimensions of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") and a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-4 versus Sony RX10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-4 and the RX10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4238b/4238bd2f71cde4070a3d7678579b6f8019e4c3d6" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and RX10 is 90 and 58 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2e36/b2e367a592022c6a530e5a3b4e5988646812faf4" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at technical specs. The photograph here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-4 and RX10.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-4 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX10 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher TG-4 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9121/e9121228ec67b0a1fb0f0f5d95a9a85e7b0cb816" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91ea4/91ea47239974652ae4f45f44ad9adc2eff2ab109" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2015-04-13 | 2014-03-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,290 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | WhiteMagic |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 10.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 813 grams (1.79 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 474 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photographs | 420 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $379 | $698 |