Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 III
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Older Model is Olympus TG-3
- Replacement is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Announced March 2016
- Previous Model is Sony RX10 II
- Updated by Sony RX10 IV
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 III Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus TG-4 versus Sony RX10 III, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the RX10 III (20MP) is very similar but the TG-4 (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") use different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-4 was announced 11 months before the RX10 III which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the TG-4 matches up vs the RX10 III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Sony RX10 III
TG-4 | RX10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus TG-4
RX10 III | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2016 | April 2015 | Newer by 11 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 460k | Clearer display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Sony RX10 III
TG-4 | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-4 has got physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") and a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-4 versus Sony RX10 III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-4 and the RX10 III.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and RX10 III is 90 and 53 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specs. The pic here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-4 and RX10 III.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-4 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony RX10 III will offer extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged TG-4 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2015-04-13 | 2016-03-29 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 1051 gr (2.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 pictures | 420 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $379 | $1,398 |