Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
![Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Tough-TG-4/Olympus-TG-4-front.jpg)
![Sony SLT-A33 front Sony SLT-A33 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/nolens/Sony_SLT-A33_0.jpg)
67 Imaging
54 Features
80 Overall
64
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Announced August 2010
- Replacement is Sony A35
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33 Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the A33 (14MP) is very comparable but the TG-4 (1/2.3") and A33 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The TG-4 was introduced 4 years after the A33 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony A33 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the TG-4 scores versus the A33 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Sony SLT-A33. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Sony A33 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Sony A33
TG-4 | A33 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2015 | ![]() | August 2010 | More modern by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A33 over the Olympus TG-4
A33 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Sony A33
TG-4 | A33 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-4 offers exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony A33 has specifications of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-4 versus the A33.
![Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33 size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Tough-TG-4-vs-Sony-SLT-A33-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and A33 is 90 and 67 respectively.
![Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Tough-TG-4-vs-Sony-SLT-A33-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing technical specs. The picture below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and A33.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-4 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus TG-4 will produce more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The younger TG-4 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
![Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-Tough-TG-4-vs-Sony-SLT-A33-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Tough-TG-4-vs-Sony-SLT-A33-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A33 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony SLT-A33 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony SLT-A33 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2015-04-13 | 2010-08-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 500 gr (1.10 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 591 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photographs | 340 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $379 | $230 |