Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A99
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
 
               
              57 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 812g - 147 x 111 x 78mm
- Released December 2012
- Old Model is Sony A900
- New Model is Sony A99 II
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images        Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A99 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A99, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and A99 (24MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and A99 (Full frame) have totally different sensor dimensions.
 Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-4 was launched 2 years after the A99 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony A99 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-4 grades against the A99 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
 Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone        Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A99 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Sony SLT-A99. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Sony A99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Sony A99
| TG-4 | A99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2015 |  | December 2012 | More modern by 29 months | 
Reasons to pick Sony A99 over the Olympus TG-4
| A99 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | 
| Screen resolution | 1229k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+769k dot) | 
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | 
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Sony A99
| TG-4 | A99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing | 
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen | 
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A99 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-4 provides external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony A99 has measurements of 147mm x 111mm x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1") with a weight of 812 grams (1.79 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A99 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-4 against the A99.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and A99 is 90 and 57 respectively.
 
          Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A99 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The pic underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-4 and A99.
To sum up, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-4 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A99 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer TG-4 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
 
          Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A99 Screen and ViewFinder
 
         Photography Glossary
Photography Glossary        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
 Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
 Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
 Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
 Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
 President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
        
                
        Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A99 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony SLT-A99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony | 
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony SLT-A99 | 
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR | 
| Revealed | 2015-04-13 | 2012-12-12 | 
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz | 
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS | 
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame | 
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm | 
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 852.0mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP | 
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 | 
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 | 
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 | 
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 | 
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 19 | 
| Cross type focus points | - | 11 | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha | 
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - | 
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - | 
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - | 
| Total lenses | - | 143 | 
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 | 
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated | 
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | 
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD | 
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic | 
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot | 
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% | 
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.71x | 
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds | 
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds | 
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes | 
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | no built-in flash | 
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless | 
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/250 seconds | 
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) | 
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 | 
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | 
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn | 
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 812 grams (1.79 pounds) | 
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 147 x 111 x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 89 | 
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.0 | 
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.0 | 
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1555 | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | 500 photos | 
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack | 
| Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-FM500H | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | 
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo; SD, SDHC and SDXC | 
| Storage slots | One | 2 | 
| Retail pricing | $379 | $1,998 | 



