Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Portability
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Portability
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched May 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-4
- New Model is Olympus TG-6
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Olympus TG-5 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-5 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very similar but the TG-5 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") have different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-5 was released 4 years later than the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the TG-5 matches up versus the XZ-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-5 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-5 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TG-5 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 |  | December 2012 | Fresher by 54 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus TG-5
| XZ-2 iHS | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TG-5 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-5 offers outside measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-5 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-5 and the XZ-2 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-5 and XZ-2 iHS is 90 and 85 respectively.
Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over technical specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-5 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with the identical MP but different sensor sizing. The TG-5 includes the tinier sensor which will make getting shallow depth of field tougher. The fresher TG-5 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-5 Portrait photography factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography factors
you can focus manually
comes with face detection focusing
exports RAW files
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has manual focus
comes with face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-5 Street photography factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography factors
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
weather sealing
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
heavier than others (250g)
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
heavier than others in class (346 grams)
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Olympus TG-5 Sports photography details
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography details
max fps high (20.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather sealing
better than average battery power (340 per charge)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
good battery (340 per charge)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-5 Travel photography information
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography information
better than average battery power (340 shots)
weather sealing
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
heavier than others (250 grams)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
good battery (340 shots)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than others in class (346g)
low resolution (12MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-5 Landscape photography factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography factors
you can focus manually
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
weather sealing
better than average battery power (340 shots)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
good battery (340 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
no Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-5 Vlogging details
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging details
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
high video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
missing external mic jack
heavier than others (250 grams)
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
has external mic port
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
heavier than others in class (346 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-5 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2017-05-17 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 20.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 250g (0.55 lb) | 346g (0.76 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | 340 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $449 | $450 |